I have always rejected a rigid Calvinist approach to salvation because it conflicts with all the Scriptures that place emphasis on personal responsibility, both in preaching the Gospel and in receiving it. But similarly, I have always rejected a rigid Arminian approach to salvation because it limits or reduces God’s omniscience. To give it a label, I guess this puts me in the Molinist camp of taking a position somewhere in the middle (described pretty well in the article below if you are interested in reading it). It is for this reason that I am always uncomfortable when salvation is tightly canned and packaged in strongly Calvinist or Arminian terms. Being saved is ultimately very simple. Understanding all of its ramifications is ultimately very difficult.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molinism
Theology Discussion – Calvinism, Arminianism, Molinism
Molinism, named after 16th Century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina, is a religious doctrine which attempts to reconcile the providence of God with human free will. William Lane Craig and Alvin Plantinga are some of its best known advocates today, though other important Molinists include Alfred Fred…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG