I appreciate your thoughts on this…
I’m responding to a question dealing with the Abrahamic Covenant. I like to link GQ articles to my response, but the following article didn’t seem quite right. After the first 3 paragraphs, the article is excellent. But, might the first 3 paragraphs need a rewrite? The first 3 paragraphs of the article repeatedly state that the Abrahamic Covenant was unconditional; requiring nothing of Abraham or his descendants. However, Abraham was required to walk before God and be blameless (Gen 17:1,2) in order for the covenant to be made, and to practice circumcision (Gen 17:9-11,14) in order to maintain it. My response (written, but not yet submitted) would conflict with the first 3 paragraphs of the GQ article.http://www.gotquestions.org/Abrahamic-covenant.html
Discussion on the Abrahamic Covenant for a Q&A
What is the Abrahamic Covenant? How is the Abrahamic Covenant related to premillennialism and amillennialism?
GOTQUESTIONS.ORG